Check it like a crawler would.
Paste-in validators check syntax. These tools fetch the live site with a crawler user-agent and evaluate the same public files and access rules AI crawlers encounter. Free, no signup, honest about what each check can and cannot prove.
Most validators only inspect pasted text. We fetch your deployed /llms.txt with a crawler user-agent and test the HTTP response, accessibility, structure, and links.
Open the toolCan ChatGPT actually see this page? One row per AI crawler, current and legacy agents, with the exact robots.txt rule that decides each.
Open the toolAllow AI search, block model training - per-agent rules grouped by role, with an explanation of every line and a warning when a choice is self-defeating.
Open the toolTwo real questions asked live to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini - named or not named per engine, with the verbatim quote as proof when named.
Open the toolA draft llms.txt built from your real pages - sitemap-discovered, robots-respecting, grouped by your URL structure - plus what your /llms.txt serves today.
Open the toolHow citable is this page? A 0-100 score across five content signals plus the three highest-leverage rewrites, before/after verified verbatim against your page.
Open the toolThe entity card an engine could build from your structured data - identity, resolved sameAs links, authorship, FAQ entities - with missing high-value fields flagged.
Open the toolMaintained by Paul, founder of Citevera · Methodology discipline: every stat we cite, sourced and framed · Sources last reviewed 2026-08-04